What is wrong with our major media? Why haven't they alerted the public that they only way they can be safe from terrorism is to vote for Kerry state-by-state? Why haven't we seen the text of the real offer from Al Queda?
THE OFFER: "Any U.S. state that will choose to vote for the white thug Bush as president has chosen to fight us, and we will consider it our enemy, and any state that will vote against Bush has chosen to make peace with us, and we will not characterize it as an enemy." -- Osama Bin Laden
You would think that knowing the details of Bin Laden's offer (American Digest: Trying to Divide the House Against Itself), all the major networks would be warning people to "VOTE KERRY OR YOUR STATE WILL DIE!"
Where are the banner headlines that inform the public (which surely has a right to know) that the only way to live is to vote for John Kerry: OSAMA TO US: VOTE BUSH, DROP DEAD. VOTE KERRY, I'LL LET YOU LIVE!
For that matter, why isn't the Kerry Campaign putting this out big-time in the last day? What a selling point! What a deal closer!
"VOTE FOR KERRY AND HE'LL CALL THE DOGS OFF!"
"A VOTE FOR JOHN KERRY IN YOUR STATE MEANS OSAMA WILL KILL ANOTHER STATE!"
"KERRY-EDWARDS MEANS MORE TAXES, BUT YOU GET TO LIVE TO PAY THEM!"
"LET YOUR INNER COWARD OUT AND VOTE FOR KERRY!"
"DON'T KILL ME! I'M FROM CALIFORNIA!"
Ah, the possibilities are endless. And the meaning of a vote for Kerry could now not be clearer. After the offer is widely known, it won't really be a case of voting for Kerry because of his "plans," or even voting for Kerry to vote "against Bush." No, now it will be much simpler.
A vote for Kerry will simply and clearly mean, and be understood by everyone else to mean, that the voter simply wanted to save his hide. Makes all those Kerry-Edwards bumper stickers and lawn signs a lot clearer, doesn't it?Posted by Vanderleun at November 1, 2003 01:12 AM | TrackBack