Take.
No.
Prisoners.
Right on the money.
Posted by: Cynyr at June 13, 2008 11:43 AMAnother: Kill them on the front end early and often.
Posted by: Webutante at June 13, 2008 2:28 PMProblem solved. Good work, Gerard.
Posted by: Kerry at June 13, 2008 3:36 PMWhy kill them? Why not simply put them under the jurisdiction of the Israelis or Egyptians or whomever?
I'm not certain that those who support giving habeus to terrorists have thought this out. Where do they believe such people will get better treatment, Gitmo or an Egyptian military prison?
Say it with me: "Rendition". You foolish lefty fools.
Posted by: Sacred Trust at June 13, 2008 5:46 PMTake no prisoners; that's not quite what I blogged, but it was indeed my first thought: depending on the outcome of the coming onslaught of litigation, Take No Prisoners might very well become an implicit battlefield tactic. It'll never be written down, but it wouldn't have to be.
Posted by: ELC at June 14, 2008 5:14 PM"It is impossible to speak in such a way that you cannot be misunderstood." -- Karl Popper N.B.: Comments are moderated to combat spam and may not appear immediately. Comments that exceed the obscenity or stupidity limits will be either edited or expunged.