Like I am going to go to some effort, so that I can see a smiling version of that face. I think the real Photochop question is how many pounds did they take off.
Posted by Fat Man at March 16, 2010 1:12 PMI tried to clean the image up a bit. This is what I got.
Posted by Mumblix Grumph at March 16, 2010 3:25 PMI could see where the image might be the photographer's reflection if he were sitting at the end of the conference table and had a window behind him with a rather unattractive window treatment--better yet, the drapes stuffed up behind the rod to let in more light--no, fuck it, it's Marx.
Posted by ahem at March 16, 2010 4:19 PMWill anyone under 45 get the song reference in the title?
Posted by Aquila at March 16, 2010 6:22 PMIt looks like the manifestation of God from "Monty Python and the Holy Grail".
Posted by TmjUtah at March 16, 2010 6:34 PMI went looking for the current issue today, and the one on the newsstands was dated March 15, and had a different cover...what is the date of this one?
Posted by Menderman at March 16, 2010 6:36 PM@tmj: I thought the same thing.
Somewhere, Graham Chapman is smiling.
Posted by WWWebb at March 16, 2010 9:35 PMsatan
Posted by reliapundit at March 17, 2010 6:58 AMNah, that ain't Marx--it's Orested Brownson!
http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&source=hp&q=Orestes%20Brownson&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi
(Now there's a guy who ought to be better known...)
Posted by Edgewise.Sigma at March 17, 2010 1:23 PMDems just could not see the image. Repub. Saw it right away.
Posted by Ed at March 17, 2010 4:03 PMDems just could not see the image. Repub. Saw it right away.
Posted by Ed at March 17, 2010 4:32 PMRegardless the outcome, they are both bad apples.
Posted by Cheezburgrrr at March 17, 2010 8:35 PMJames Clerk Maxwell
Posted by M. Simon at March 20, 2010 5:15 PM