Comments: "No child left alive." Is Your Local Police Department Using Pictures of Pregnant Women and Children for Target Practice?
Posted by Jewel at February 19, 2013 2:25 PM
I was thinking more of the LA cops who shot up the wrong truck with two women instead of a large black man in it. That's no hesitation. Or as some of us might say, craven over-reaction.
Lon Horiuchi had plenty of time to think about blowing out Vicky Weaver's brains while studying her through his scope as she was held her baby.
Posted by mushroom at February 19, 2013 3:10 PM
Post dorner they are going to need a new target I guess.
Posted by Alphonse at February 19, 2013 3:25 PM
Like the police give a damn about shooting innocent people who are not a threat, it happens all the time.
If you are not doing anything wrong, you have everything to fear.
Posted by Potsie at February 19, 2013 3:34 PM
It's not that they don't care. Think, Where do the police often come from? From Iraq and Afghanistan. And what was the training there? If you're suspicious about anything, shoot first, because something out of the ordinary is an IED or suicide jihadi coming at you. When things go down, you play like you practice, and the high-kinetic high-intensity practice in the suck over-rides.
Remember MIB#1? The mil guys blazed away, the cop hesitated and evaluated. Now look at the photo. The firearm is not immediately obvious, a low-contrast scene. If the company sold equivalent pictures without a firearm, or with ambiguous object, then I wouldn't be so concerned, because they are then training the police to assess before coming to position four.
Posted by John A. Fleming at February 19, 2013 4:15 PM
Why anyone in this day and age would be surprised at how cheap life is is beyond me.
Posted by Kerry at February 19, 2013 5:22 PM
Think 47% takers, think livs, think 1 in 6 on food stamps. That's why lives are gonna be cheap. It's going to be the new gestalt of the age.
Posted by John A. Fleming at February 19, 2013 5:53 PM
@Bill Jones--I like that quote. Can you divulge the source so I can add it to my quotations file complete.
Posted by Anonymous at February 20, 2013 7:48 AM
“The police are to the government as the edge is to the knife,” insists sociologist David Bayley...
Posted by Rob De Witt at February 20, 2013 9:05 AM
It has always been, 'If you aren't wth us, you're against us." There are no moderates.
I guess we're going to have to aim just below the helmet line and make the shots count.
Do you think the cops would mind having their image on a target?
Posted by Vermont Woodchuck at February 20, 2013 2:45 PM
No, using an image of a police officer would be horrible and a violent act. However the police using an image of a child or pregnant woman is acceptable.
When the police record you, it is acceptable... "if you are not doing anything wrong you have nothing to worry about."If you try to record the police you will be charged with a crime, because the police are always doing the wrong thing and they don't want photographic or video evidence of it.
The police are another example of unionized government thugs. They are not on your side there to help you.
Posted by Potsie at February 20, 2013 3:35 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)