Comments: "When leftist tree huggers and leftist bicycle riders collide."

Uhh . . . can't the stupid bike path go AROUND the tree? I mean, we are talking about conveyances noted for weaving and threading dexterously through stalled motor vehicle traffic. Bureaucrats are boobs by nature.

Posted by Don Rodrigo at February 21, 2013 1:08 PM

A shit load of toothpicks, go for it!

I had some bozo in Vermont get unhinged because the paper agreed to the cutting down a 100 year old tree.

He claimed that you cannot replace a tree that age.

When I wrote sure you can, it only takes 100 years. he dissolved into a puddle of liquid poop. I know because he called the paper to rant.

Posted by Vermont Woodchuck at February 21, 2013 3:46 PM

100 years is young, for a sequoia, so age isn't any reason to save it. A better reason is that sequoias are beautiful trees. But really, I would have to see some photos of how the tree is situated vis-a-vis traffic lanes, etc, before I could make a reasoned decision.

Posted by Grizzly at February 21, 2013 7:56 PM

I want to see Chis Fountain cry.

Posted by Fat Man at February 21, 2013 8:57 PM

Crying is so helpful in these cases.

Posted by Sam L. at February 22, 2013 10:51 AM

Post a comment

Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)