Comments: "When leftist tree huggers and leftist bicycle riders collide."
Uhh . . . can't the stupid bike path go AROUND the tree? I mean, we are talking about conveyances noted for weaving and threading dexterously through stalled motor vehicle traffic. Bureaucrats are boobs by nature.
Posted by Don Rodrigo at February 21, 2013 1:08 PM
A shit load of toothpicks, go for it!
I had some bozo in Vermont get unhinged because the paper agreed to the cutting down a 100 year old tree.
He claimed that you cannot replace a tree that age.
When I wrote sure you can, it only takes 100 years. he dissolved into a puddle of liquid poop. I know because he called the paper to rant.
Posted by Vermont Woodchuck at February 21, 2013 3:46 PM
I'm reluctant to destroy something that's 100 years in the making, guess that's why I'm a conservative.
Fuck the bikes.
Posted by Bill Jones at February 21, 2013 6:28 PM
100 years is young, for a sequoia, so age isn't any reason to save it. A better reason is that sequoias are beautiful trees. But really, I would have to see some photos of how the tree is situated vis-a-vis traffic lanes, etc, before I could make a reasoned decision.
Posted by Grizzly at February 21, 2013 7:56 PM
I want to see Chis Fountain cry.
Posted by Fat Man at February 21, 2013 8:57 PM
Crying is so helpful in these cases.
Posted by Sam L. at February 22, 2013 10:51 AM