Comments: "When leftist tree huggers and leftist bicycle riders collide."

Uhh . . . can't the stupid bike path go AROUND the tree? I mean, we are talking about conveyances noted for weaving and threading dexterously through stalled motor vehicle traffic. Bureaucrats are boobs by nature.

Posted by Don Rodrigo at February 21, 2013 1:08 PM

A shit load of toothpicks, go for it!

I had some bozo in Vermont get unhinged because the paper agreed to the cutting down a 100 year old tree.

He claimed that you cannot replace a tree that age.

When I wrote sure you can, it only takes 100 years. he dissolved into a puddle of liquid poop. I know because he called the paper to rant.

Posted by Vermont Woodchuck at February 21, 2013 3:46 PM

100 years is young, for a sequoia, so age isn't any reason to save it. A better reason is that sequoias are beautiful trees. But really, I would have to see some photos of how the tree is situated vis-a-vis traffic lanes, etc, before I could make a reasoned decision.

Posted by Grizzly at February 21, 2013 7:56 PM

I want to see Chis Fountain cry.

Posted by Fat Man at February 21, 2013 8:57 PM

Crying is so helpful in these cases.

Posted by Sam L. at February 22, 2013 10:51 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Remember me?