"Doesn't anyone caaaare (sob)?
Where are are VALUUUUES?".
Misspelling is intentional to illustrate a point.
The immature leading the ignorant as both follow a con artist.
Posted by Dan Patterson at June 10, 2014 4:44 PMHeh, to coin a phrase. I've wondered how many of the White House Staff have degrees from Ivy League colleges.
Posted by chuck at June 10, 2014 4:48 PM"We've walked on the moon, but women still don't have equal pay"
It's pretty hard to argue with that kind of logic.
JWM
Posted by jwm at June 10, 2014 5:17 PMWhat's 6 years among friends?
Posted by Fat Man at June 10, 2014 6:06 PMGlad someone noted the weird and non sequitur arguments libs are using these days. Oh, and 1969 was a fabulous year, wasn't it?
Posted by Casey Klahn at June 10, 2014 6:32 PMWell a WOMAN hasn't walked on the moon that is why.
screw "progess"
Posted by meep meep at June 10, 2014 7:50 PMWell he'd know, the women in the White House get paid less than the men. What's that you say? Different positions, different experience levels, different situations?
Yes. Yes indeed.
Posted by Christopher Taylor at June 10, 2014 7:59 PMPolitical conflicts are merely surface manifestations. If conflicts arise you may be sure that certain powers intend to keep the conflicts under operation since they hope to profit from the situation.
I know, let's get the women to fight the queers, both of them to fight the males, and all of them to fight all the:
Christian
American
heterosexual
pro-gun
Conservative
any questions?
Oh look. A rabbit.
That's right Chris.
The whole notion of equal anything is way beyond retarded.
People yappin' about such things require a hard crack right across the mouth.
Like sand paper, they're wearing me down with their abrasive idiocy, eventually to that tender but explosive underbelly and no one knows what entails when that bastion has been breached.
Posted by ghostsniper at June 11, 2014 6:13 AMIf women were better at math, this bogus statistic would not still be floating around.
Posted by SteveS at June 12, 2014 10:43 AM