Yeah, i agree and I don't use tumbler.

Regarding the Z Blog entry:
What's the point of the polysyllabic obfuscation and distortion of the simple meaning of the word 'conservatism?'
Conserving what? The simple, permanent [because truthful and self-evident] principles stated in the second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence, and limitations on the federal government as stated in the Constitution -- the Constitution with its Amendments as stated, not as warped into areas of jurisdiction not originally intended.
All this neo, post-modern [futuristic?], bombastic, atavistic babbling waste time and effort.
Where do you want to live in the spectrum ranging between slavery and freedom, between disdain and respect, between irresponsibility and responsibility? What principles will be appropriate guides in addition to those spelled out in the DoI, Constitution, and the Platinum Principle, "Knowingly or unknowingly, do no harm. But if you must do some harm do as little as necessary, and repair the damage done, as necessary." This is a thinking humane's credo.

"Why attach the propeller to a perfectly normal car?"

Looks like that car was made to shred pedestrians.

When I was a kid nobody had air-conditioning in their car. All we had were fans.

Speaking of A/C, when did they stop putting vent windows on cars?

Dwight Howard is first in line:

Celebrate Assholes Get a Punch in the Face Day.

If that doesn't work he should be horse-whipped and pissed on.

This was a non-racist remark.

Chasmatic, I think the young fellow should aim lower, in a non-racist "you're an asshole so here's a punch in the nuts" kind of way.

There are positively a couple extra fine points to take addicted to consideration, except merit for sharing this info.