Comments: Serial Monsters
It's not so much a question of numbers. Caucasian serial killers are as different from black and Mestizo killers as golf is to Rugby. Dead is dead, but the differences are quite remarkable.
Posted by james wilson at September 9, 2014 10:20 AM
In Mexico i assume 100% of the serial killers (and there are a lot of them) are Mexican. Same with Guatemala, Colombia, etc. I think white would stand out too much down there. That problem about serial killers always being portrayed as white is mostly PC politics. I do not see how in a city like Detroit where it averages over 350 murders a year that the assumption would be 350 different people commit one murder a year there. Over a period of years that starts to look suspicious. In a ten yr. period that means approximately 3500 different people commit a murder or there must be individuals there who are responsible a lot larger amount. Which might mean quit a few serial killers roaming the streets with a built in excuse (gang). That place should be fenced off to protect the rest of the country from that extremely violent bunch.
Posted by Kelvin at September 9, 2014 11:37 AM
While there are the gangsta killers, they aren't usually considered serial monsters by the FBI (killers, sexual predators, spree killers, etc). At least according to the FBI stats the types of lunacy aren't any different in gender despite the ethnic background. Men tend to be the John Wayne Gacy type more than women, for example, while women tend to be poisoners or manipulators. But asian, hispanic, whatever, its not a matter of race or intelligence. Its a matter of madness.
Posted by Christopher Taylor at September 11, 2014 4:20 PM