Comments: Who Says There's No Good News?
So are we going to start considering the motives behind "awarding" a Rhodes Scholarship in the same light that we consider the "criteria" in "awarding" a Nobel Prize?
Well, Rhodes Scholarships are racist investment funded for one.
Nobel Prizes come from "royalties" on years of patented death, destruction, and uh...mining.
Birds of a feather.
Posted by CaptDMO at October 13, 2014 5:10 AM
I wonder how low their ratings have to sink before some of the smugness and arrogance begin to wear off? (It's rhetorical, I already know the answer.)
Posted by BillH at October 13, 2014 7:43 AM
If it weren't for the right leaning commentators watching MSNBC for red meat posts, how much lower would their ratings be?
I mean, your friends and staff at MSNBC can't consist of enough viewers to support a network can they?
Posted by Christopher Taylor at October 13, 2014 9:06 AM
They cannot drop those shows. Doing so would eliminate any leftist voice; the wackos, though small in number would be in the streets, frothing at the mouth in withdrawal. Medicare probably funds a good part of these shows as mental insurance for the afflicted.
Posted by Vermont Woodchuck at October 13, 2014 11:43 AM
First prize should be a good hard punch in the face.
Second prize should be two punches.
Posted by chasmatic at October 14, 2014 11:00 PM
In the end it will not fare well for all the genetic misfit perverts that have *come out* as they say. They will wear their scarlet crosses to the grave, which hopefully will be soon.
In the past such cretins were relegated to scorn, ostracism, banishment, and death. In less than 10 years, maybe less than 5, they will be no more.
It is preordained.
Posted by ghostsniper at October 15, 2014 9:22 AM