Comments: In 1901, the average "urban wage earner"

It didn't take but 23 years to take us back a century. If one takes away all the federal subsidies, those in 1901 at least had jobs.

Hell, the numbers used are not even on the scale used for the poverty levels.

Posted by Vermont Woodchuck at January 30, 2015 5:50 AM

"Today, families with incomes of less than $5,000 a year".

Should that read $50,000/year? I can't imagine that any family survives on $5,000/year. Hell, that wouldn't cover ciggies and booze.

Posted by Syd B. at January 30, 2015 7:31 AM

The more you make the more they take and the less everybody has, except for them.

Strive to cut out the middle man, but only if you think you deserve it.

Posted by ghostsniper at January 30, 2015 9:04 AM

Post a comment




Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)