Many Americans have outsourced their righteous anger and justifiable hatred. We are like the French Aristocracy, demonstrating our inclusion in The System by adopting habits and opinions less and less suited for survival outside of pampered society. How many Americans preface ANY comment about Islam or Muslims with 2 paragraphs about which part of Islam or how few Muslims are the problem? Since when did any of us become mind readers? Who are you trying to impress with your moderate and balanced view on the subject? What responsibility do you think any of us have to any of them?

The best way to treat an enemy that is as murderous as Islam is to out-crazy them. In certain urban neighborhoods it's called mad-doggin', in a movie it's called "the Chicago way". You don't out-crazy Jihadists by making ever smaller and ever more precise smart bombs and drones seeking to vaporize Abdullah Muhammad but leaving Muhammad Abdullah unscathed 4 feet away. They set off a car bomb, we vaporize their city. Nothing in Islam needs to be preserved. If there are any good Muslims the mad dog strategy either causes them to kill the "bad Muslims" before they build a car bomb, or it causes them to pick a side, ours or theirs. Whether we like it or not, there is no sanctuary, no rules, no limits. THEY decided that's how the war must go. That's how they fight. Our only choices are whether to fight and how hard we should make our life in fighting back. Why are we waiting for another Sept 11? We don't need up-armored school buses so we can keep pretending we aren't at war and also safe from war. We are at war and we leave our enemy among us, dictating rules to us in DC, CAIR has editorial control over FBI training material.

We have over 5,000 nukes in warehouse waiting to be dismantled, plus the almost two thousand nukes ready to go. We have the tools, we don't have the will. Half of our side wants to surrender, and half of the other half aren't yet sure we have to fight, really fight. We owe them nothing, nothing! The people that would call me or you war-criminals for winning this war are not going to notice if a Muslim kills your entire family. These "by the rule" types are status whoring for credit from other intellectual status whores. For them it's better you die at the hands of some "lone wolf" than the family of the next lone wolf is flown back to Crapistan before their son kills more Americans. You don't get comfortable about war, you win or lose a war. We suspended habeus corpus and then restored it after The Civil War. We interned Japanese during WWII and then ended that. Nobody was advocating slaughter of Muslims before Sept 11, it did us no good on Sept 11. Once Muslims understand they will no longer exist until they kill the "bad Muslims" or change the bloodshed can end. But who cares what Muslims think about how we win? Worrying about How, is an excuse for deciding to lose the war. Their culture understands The Strong Horse and The Weak Horse, they don't even notice our self-limits as anything but weakness. We have no right to encourage our enemy to remain comfortable. When they car bomb an elementary school, it won't kill only the kids of warmongers. Nobody has found another way to change Islam. They will not change Islam if they think even one of them will survive by not changing Islam. There is no need for even one more soldier to die in the sand. There is no need for this war to last another 24 hours. We could win it today. We should have won it on Sept 12, 2001.

"We are at War with the Politicians and the Media"

They are at War against us.

It takes ONE to fight. Not two.

Torches.Pitchforks.Tar.Feathers.

I didn't get any farther than this:

"....enemy that is as murderous as Islam...."

The obvious reason is apparently not so obvious to many.

Hint: Words mean things.

heh.

Gavin McInnes: I'm Not A Conservative
www . youtube . com/watch?v=9rrtttOCtq8

Thanks for the pointer to Gavin, Gerard. I'll watch for him in the future.

The real question is why they were not armed.