Comments: If you think Trump will lose, you are probably comparing him to an ideal you hold for what a president should be.
When I read this stuff, I remember that Scott Adams also classed Hillary Clinton as "a wizard". Really. According to him the election was going to be between two wizards, Clinton and Trump. Funny man.
Posted by chuck at October 1, 2015 8:34 AM
"If I did this right, and I am sure I did, I predict you will see the biggest mess of word-salad in the comments that you have ever seen. Roughly one-third of the comments to this post should make no sense whatsoever..."
Uh... phft ppltt.. bfphht... bleb pa ...
Okay, you win. :D
"I always link to the Kindle version of my contrarian book about success but I wonder if this sort of book works best in paper form because it is an ideal gift for young employees. (See what I did there? I asked you to think past the sale. That’s a Trump trick.)"
Sorry Scott, unable to comprehend the meaning of the above sentence: Next time place the picture of that pretty young lady a little further down the page (maybe under the 'fold'... Meanwhile... I'll get around to discerning what it says later... ;)
Posted by John Condon at October 1, 2015 1:19 PM
The rational side of me is willing to admit that Trump stands a good chance of winning. But then I can't overcome this sense of surreality, as if we lived in a time when a completely unqualified poltroon with no experience, say a junior senator from Illinois, could win the presidency and still get re-elected after four years of scandals and failed policy. I mean, we don't really live in those kind of times, do we?
Posted by Grizzly at October 1, 2015 6:18 PM
Quoting another, I am of the opinion that there will be no voting ourselves out of this.
Only violence is going to provide enough movement to matter.
Posted by JudgmentComes at October 2, 2015 10:48 AM