I am rather perturbed by the rip on the Furniture Bank. I am a long time donor at an elevated level. I have been most impressed by their operation. They are what a charity ought to be, private, privately funded, and local. Indeed they are to me a model for abolishing all "welfare systems". It is possible that some of the clients have not been angles. Actually it is certain. Nonetheless, as the tax funded system collapses, the country will need a lot more Furniture Banks, and less of the Congressional fustercluck pictured above.

Fat Man,I stand with you. I spend 2 days a week working at a similar local charity. Zero percent taxpayer money. One of the bylaws forbids holding more than 2 months budget in the bank. Yes there are those who take advantage but even they have so pathetically little. But when you see somebody who just got out of a shelter go from 4 bare walls to a home you know you are on the right road.

Sorry about the double pos

GOOD STRONG POINTS.

Updated.

Why people still make use of to read news papers when in this technological
globe the whole thing is available on net?

It's perfect time to make some plans for the future and it is time
to be happy. I've read this post and if
I could I desire to suggest you some interesting things or
advice. Maybe you could write next articles referring to this
article. I desire to read more things about it!

As Mr Boustany said: to SERVE Families in need.

Excuse me, but wasn't involuntary servitude outlawed back in the 19th century? Why indeed do we take money from hard working people and give it to others? I do not live to serve others, except as encountered in a voluntary exchange. In-voluntary, as in forced at the point of a weapon by IRS stooges, is called slavery in some circles.
Obviously, I am taking this to the extreme, but where in the Constitution is the power to force me to give the fruits of my labor to someone else?
Un-forced, fine by me. Forced, not so much