The First Terrorist War [Written 2003]

It's a fine treatise on a dismal subject. A subject noteworthy for the lassitude among our fighters - among us.

Down here in the lowest reaches of our society, there is fight. Of course, the people look for leadership. We need a Pershing, a Patton, and a Churchill.

Posted by Casey Klahn at May 23, 2017 8:05 PM

"...the people look for leadership..."
========================

Well, sort of.
WWII was won because there was a consensus and the political body was mostly trustworthy and provided this leadership.

Look at what you have today. Do you trust ANY of the politicians? What would it take, and how long would it take, for you to trust the leadership of US politicians?

My life won't last long enough for that long lost trust to reemerge.

Posted by ghostsniper at May 23, 2017 8:33 PM

Timeline Sept. 11, 2101, Battery Park:

Small girl to her Grandad: "What's that big stone thing over there with all the letters on it?"
Grandad: "That's a memorial to all the people who were killed when the Muslims attacked us, just about here, 100 years ago today."

Little girl scrunches her face up for a long time, obviously thinking hard.

"Grandad, what's a Muslim?"

Posted by Fletcher Christian at May 24, 2017 3:47 AM

As stirring as it is undeniable.

Ed

Posted by Everyman at May 24, 2017 8:33 AM

Francis Porretto has a most excellent post up on this.
http://bastionofliberty.blogspot.com/2017/05/a-time-for-clarity.html

JWM

Posted by jwm at May 24, 2017 9:46 AM

Till control of the Broadcasting Infrastructure is yanked out of the hands of Liberals, there will be no stirring of the people to solve this problem.

Posted by DiogenesLamp at May 24, 2017 10:45 AM

There is irrational, and then there is overly rational. Only one points to life, because it is life.

Posted by james wilson at May 24, 2017 11:20 AM

"An Ocean of Glass"

Perhaps, time for a re-post?

The only "Final Solution"

If we nuked some muzzie country every time this happens this shit would stop, and that right quick.

Posted by Fuel Filter at May 25, 2017 5:02 AM

Why would the goal be the destruction of "radical" islam and not just islam?

Posted by Jeanine at May 26, 2017 6:06 PM

the only way to stop muslims from murdering innocent people is to send them all back to where they came from. it would be a lot cheaper than spending trillions trying to beef up security and try to outguess where they will next strike. some of you think that would be cruel to send them back but, muslims admit their goal is to conquer the world and kill all who refuse to believe their false religion. sending muslims back to their original countries will not happen as long as the powers that be stay in office.The progressives are part of the new world order and will conveniently use the muslims to destroy any godly semblance of society. When there is no more rule of law, then the (NWO) will step into the chaos and take over. There will no longer be a need for the muslims and they will in turn be destroyed.

Posted by 007 at May 28, 2017 8:48 AM

reply to 007 above:

The NWO types may *think* they're going to get rid of their Islamic shock-troops.

They're going to be ... unpleasantly surprised. Even "Mutually Assured Destruction" will not deter Islam. As Muslims have told us repeatedly, they do not fear death. The true name of Islam's god is Moloch, and his demands for more death, destruction, and terror will never be satisfied.

Posted by Nobody Special at May 28, 2017 11:37 PM

I am not inclined to accept the idea that the U.S. should try to eradicate Muslims. Congress should pass clear and unambiguous legislation barring Muslims from entering the country. Very few exceptions should be permitted and then only after extraordinary vetting. We let our European friends understand that no visas will be granted to Muslims traveling from Europe. Muslims will be forced to stay in their home countries (and European countries stupid enough to admit them) and we allow them to kill each other until they decide to end the madness and reform their religion.
Does the U.S. have the resolve to do this? Probably not.

Posted by Philip Nolan at May 30, 2017 8:21 PM
AMERICAN DIGEST :HOME

Post a comment

"It is impossible to speak in such a way that you cannot be misunderstood." -- Karl Popper N.B.: Comments that exceed the obscenity or stupidity limits will be either edited or expunged










Remember personal info?