Perfectly put. But the "bluebanders" are incapable of seeing it like this. Perhaps some day they might see with clarity. Of course, not that I wish any harm to anyone, but it would be very satisfying if the next terrorist event within our shores happens in front of the homes of Ted Kennedy, John Kerry and Barbara Boxer. Not while they are home, of couse, because I want the satisfaction of seeing them change their tune regarding the whole terrorist thing.

Can't think of a better use for the money. Only downside is that if Kerry had won, the inaug would probably have raised $50 million for those hardworking folks. Repubs just can't compete with dems when it comes to raising money to worship their heroes.

Of course, that argument can be used to justify virtually any conspicuous consumption by the wealthy, from the construction and operation of yachts to Dennis Koszlowski's birthday party, since virtually all such activities ultimately pump money into the wages of the workers. It may well be that conscpicuous consumption requires no justification, but the fact that money from such consumption benefits working stiffs does not add anything to the discussion.

So I guess I disagree. The inaugural festivities are either appropriate or not, regardless of their impact on the distribution of wealth.